R03 — JAPANESE GRAND PRIX

Hamilton podium at Suzuka

7%

7% chance for Hamilton to finish on the podium at Suzuka. P4 in Australia, P3 in China (first Ferrari podium). Improving race by race.

7%Hamilton
25%7%40%

7% [25%40%] (95% CI)

01 / KEY FACTORS

Impact by factor

China P3 (first Ferrari podium)
+7.8%
Experience at Suzuka (7x WDC)
+6.2%
Mercedes-Ferrari gap persists
-4.8%
Ferrari P2 constructors (67 pts)
+4.5%
Improving Ferrari adaptation
+3.5%
Suzuka favours downforce (Mercedes)
-3.2%
Leclerc intra-team battle
-1.8%
Impact total+12.2%
02 / MONTE CARLO SIMULATION

Distribution and quantitative analysis

10,000 simulations Monte Carlo

Position Distribution

10,000 simulations

Distribution Statistics

N Simulations10k paths
ExpectedP3.3
MedianP3
ModeP2
Std Dev2.13
Skewness+1.93 →
VaR 95%P8
CVaR 95%P9.7
Prob(P1)12.0%
Prob(Podium)66.2%
Prob(Points)98.8%
Prob(DNF)3.0%

Convergence

Scenario Analysis — Hamilton

ScenarioPositionProb.Conditions
Best case (P5)P112%Rain at Shanghai, Hamilton mastery, overtakes on-track from P3-P4 grid
Optimistic (P25)P325%Qualifies P4, benefits from safety car restart to gain podium position
Base case (P50)P530%P5-P6 qualifying, consistent race pace, best of the rest behind Mercedes
Conservative (P75)P714%Struggles with Ferrari setup, loses positions to McLaren duo in race
Worst case (P95)P115%Qualifying error, first-corner contact, poor tyre strategy call

Sensitivity Analysis

03 / FEATURE ANALYSIS

Variable analysis

Base value5.0%
Output7%
5.0%
7%
circuit_history_wins+10.5%
driver_experience+5.8%
circuit_knowledge+4.2%
constructor_ranking+3.2%
team_adaptation-5.4%
car_delta-4.1%
teammate_form-2.3%
Feature importancei
circuit_history_wins
0.168
driver_experience
0.135
team_adaptation
0.118
car_delta
0.105
circuit_knowledge
0.092
constructor_ranking
0.078
teammate_form
0.065
qualifying_pace
0.055
race_pace_trend
0.042
pit_strategy
0.032
Feature correlationsi
form_score
constructor
quali_pace
circuit_hist
tyre_deg
reliability
form_score
constructor
quali_pace
circuit_hist
tyre_deg
reliability
-1.0
0
+1.0
04 / MODEL VALIDATION

Model performance

Model performancei
Accuracy0.720+0.220 vs baseline
Brier Score0.041-0.006 vs baseline
Log Loss1.945
AUC-ROC0.798
Calibration curvei
0%0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%PredictedActual
Confusion matrix
Predicted vs Actual72% accuracy
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
Actual
P1
18
5
3
1
0
P2
4
15
6
2
1
P3
2
5
14
5
2
P4
1
2
4
12
5
P5
0
1
2
4
10
Pred.
Track characteristicsi
Top SpeedDownforceTyre WearBrakingOvertakingPU Demand

Accuracy

72%

across 127 race winner predictions

Average Brier score

0.041

probability calibration

Last correct

Abu Dhabi 2025

Abu Dhabi 2025 — Hamilton P4

05 / CIRCUIT ANALYSIS

Circuit factors

Suzuka history

Last 5 races

2017

P1

2019

P1

2023

P5

2024

P2

2025

P3

Practice pace

Gap to leader (sec)

RUS
REF
LEC
+0.5s
HAM
+0.6s
NOR
+0.3s

Tyre degradation

Lap time, laps 1-20

Lap 1Cliff ~L12Lap 20
Lap time distributioni
Hamilton
Leclerc
Russell
94.0s95.0s96.0s97.0s
06 / COMPARISON

Hamilton vs Leclerc vs Russell

Hamilton
Leclerc
Russell

Circuit history

98
72
75

Experience

98
78
72

Race pace

82
86
90

Car adaptation

60
92
95

Recent form

68
80
95
Head-to-headi
DriverQuali avgRace paceFinishesPodiumsDNFs
Hamilton3.21:34.517101
Leclerc4.11:34.8410
Verstappen2.81:34.3520
07 / EVOLUTION & DATA

Probability over time

Training Data Sample4 rows x 8 cols
#racedrivergridresultform_scoreconstructorqualifying_gapprediction
1CHN 2024Hamilton4P20.7800.820+0.4s22%
2CHN 2019Hamilton1P10.9200.940+0.0s35%
3AUS 2026Hamilton7P60.7200.800+0.8s18%
4AUS 2026Leclerc5P30.7900.800+0.6s35%